Why Is Fiat Money Not a Good Means of Exchange


Why Is Fiat Money Not a Good Means of Exchange

Money is the most important thing in this world. It makes the world go round and makes it possible for people to live their lives comfortably. The basic definition of money is: money is any actual material thing that can be taken as payment for commodities and/or services and payment of debts, including taxes, in a given society or socio-economic context.”



Money has three functions. First, it is widely accepted as legal tender. This means that money has legal tender as payment for products and services. Without money, there would be no exchange of commodities and payments for services. This is why banks and other monetary institutions exist.


Second, money can be a medium of exchange. It is traded, bought and sold in markets. For example, you go to the supermarket and buy a can of milk. You then go back home and cash in your can of milk. In this example, the milk can be considered a medium of exchange because it is a known product and has a price.


Third, money can be a good substitute for goods that don’t have a market on their own. Let’s look at an agricultural market. If you don’t have your own food, how are you going to purchase them? How are you going to store them? Without money, you could become bankrupt due to exchange-traded goods are not convertible into cash-equivalents.


Now take a look at how money came about. Money was a physical commodity that could be exchanged in a market for another good that didn’t have a market on its own. For example, money has always been a medium of exchange, a guarantee that something will be accepted as a replacement for another physical commodity. Money became widely accepted and valuable because it was seen as a guarantee that goods would be accepted and stored in physical markets. This is why, for example, when you enter a bank and withdraw cash from your checking account, you are actually transferring some of your money to a medium of exchange.


Money in general has always been a medium of exchange. When you transfer your money from one account to another, you are in effect transferring your money from a medium of exchange to a physical commodity. This is why, for example, when you go to buy food in the grocery store, you are in effect transferring your money from a medium of exchange to a physical commodity. In the case of the economy, the money is the economy.


Money was important for economic growth because it meant that goods were recognized as valuable and could be exchanged for other goods. Without money, goods would not be recognized as valuable and therefore they could not be exchanged for other goods. Therefore, without money, there would be no economy. Which brings us back to the original question: why is there the concept of fiat money? Why does the government insist on the use of fiat money instead of the more widely recognized and accepted commodity money?


The government has always preferred commodities (in the form of gold) to currency because they have always been considered to be a stable store of value. Nowadays, however, with the economic crisis sweeping across the globe, the government realizes that their chosen store of value, which was money, may no longer be as secure as it was before. Since they are not spending their monies as rapidly as they used to, there is a dire need to find a new means by which to keep the money circulating within the economy. The solution to this problem is to introduce a fiat money system, which is just like gold coins in that it is a fiat currency that is backed by the governments of the nations in which it is issued. If you want to trade in commodities and you want to avoid the risks associated with physical commodity money, then you should definitely consider using a digital asset like the bitcoin virtual currency.


No comments yet, be the first by filling the form.